Symphonic music
heute: 5
gestern: 12
diese Woche: 5
letzte Woche: 125
dieser Monat: 336
letzter Monat: 1055
Total: 45920

United States 45.9%United StatesRussian Federation 2.3%Russian FederationBelgium 1.3%BelgiumFinland 0.8%FinlandPortugal 0.6%PortugalMexico 0.4%Mexico
Germany 15.7%GermanyUnited Kingdom 2.2%United KingdomSpain 1.3%SpainAustria 0.8%AustriaSweden 0.6%SwedenUkraine 0.4%Ukraine
Italy 3.1%ItalyFrance 1.9%FranceSwitzerland 1.2%SwitzerlandTaiwan 0.8%TaiwanCzech Republic 0.5%Czech RepublicSingapore 0.4%Singapore
Republic Of Korea 3%Republic Of KoreaBrazil 1.6%BrazilTurkey 1.2%TurkeyIsrael 0.6%IsraelIslamic Republic Of Iran 0.5%Islamic Republic Of IranDenmark 0.4%Denmark
Japan 2.7%JapanNetherlands 1.5%NetherlandsCanada 1.1%CanadaAustralia 0.6%AustraliaPoland 0.5%PolandMalaysia 0.4%Malaysia
recent visitor statistic


User Rating: 5 / 5

Star ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar Active

Ravels own orchestra arrangement (1910) of the Pianocomposition from 1899

The original Tempo

This Interpretation follows the original tempoadvice: 1/4 = 54 bpm as guideline and mostly the upper limit of the realised Tempo, following at the same time aswell notated tempochanges as tempochanges as part of the interpretation without leaving the overall guideline of the demanded tempo anywhere completly. This seemingly implicitness is noteworthy, since from 35 other inspect Interpretations only two are sligthly faster than demanded (Rosbaud 1937 und Eugen Ormandy 1973) the otther are more or less slower than the demanded Tempo. In Average the Interpretations are one Minute longer. That makes a Tempo  1/4 = 44 bpm which is 20% slower than demanded in the score.

Specialty of the Instrumentation

As demanded by Ravel this recording uses not the sound of modern Horn with Valves but two natural horn in G.


Add comment

Security code